Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 14:33

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Russia can stop this any time.
Israel says it killed 9 Iranian nuclear scientists, and braces for attacks from Iran - NPR
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Robinhood Traders Playing S&P Index-Guessing Game Get Schooled - Bloomberg
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Once-a-week pill for schizophrenia shows promise in clinical trials - MIT News
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
With 2026 World Cup a year away, the USMNT is directionless - Yahoo Sports
Let’s just make it real clear:
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.